Jump to Navigation Jump to Main content

首頁
  • 認識我們
  • 教學研習
    • 教師研習活動報名區
    • 活動集錦
    • 教學研習影音分享區
    • 教師研習活動積分查詢方式
    • 教師研習活動積分申請作業
    • AI人工智慧研習影音專區
  • 新進教師
  • 傑出教授
  • 教師專業社群
  • 重點宣導
  • 借用項目
  • 資料下載

教師電子報: what do people think about hybrid-PBL in the Asia Pacific region?

您在這裡

首頁 - 活動集錦

教師電子報: what do people think about hybrid-PBL in the Asia Pacific region?

The Center for Faculty Development (CDF), after its 4-year establishment in our university, has recently taken an initiative of launching a new line of service, that is, to provide a platform for our faculty members to publish their ideas on issues of their interests and concerns regarding their career development and professional activities.  We have already accepted two articles written by our faculty members in Chinese. As the Director of CFD, I am writing the following article for a number of reasons. First of all, I wish to write it in English so that our website would be more accessible for international scholars and to attract their interest in academic arena in our university and in Taiwan. Secondly, I wish to write it on a subject that is of both local and international concerns and interests in medical education. Thirdly, I wish to clarify on a number of issues of the popular hybrid PBL which is now so widely employed worldwide and especially in the Asia Pacific region. Fourthly, I would like to use this opportunity to encourage our faculty to raise topics on academic issues to express, inform, discuss, debate, critique and to share with other members in the academic community, domestic or international.

I personally have felt over my 4-year stay at China Medical University that our faculty members seemed to be minding their own businesses without engaging in much dialogue and communication with our fellow teachers. We rarely make our voices known and willingly remain submissive. Some are making a lot of complaints, but are reluctant to help solve problems.  Some do not bother polishing our communication in Chinese, leave alone expression in English.  In the following, I present to you a series of dialogues amongst university teachers in the Asia Pacific region who expressed their opinions over an e-mail group ([pblaspac] group) on PBL in medical education. This international e-mail group was organized several years ago by an Indonesian scholar, Professor Adrianta, who wishes to use this e-mail group as a dialogue platform for information and idea exchange for many university teachers in many countries of Asia Pacific region who may not be fortunate to have the funding or opportunity to travel abroad for international meetings on PBL.  I have been associated with this group for many years since its inception and enjoyed the academic discussion. Beside PBL topics, we have recently discussed issues on avoiding the pitfalls in the use of“MCQ as an assessment method”. Some members asked for clarification on “outcome-based learning” and some were interested in knowing a clearer definition of “formative evaluations”.  This group also can catalyze international research in medical education.  I particularly enjoyed meeting and talking to old acquaintances and new friends over the e-mail and to be able to contribute in an academically meaningful manner during my spare time.

The following boxes represent a series of e-mail messages sent by individual teachers from many different countries in Asia Pacific countries in the order of the time being sent out as an e-mail message, on a specific topic raised by Professor Adrianta. The enthusiasm on this discussion had been overwhelming.

 

Dear members :

        I like to get more information about the advantages and disadvantages of a hybrid curriculum for medical students. With hybrid, I mean that there is still the traditional lectures (discipline based like anatomy, physiology biochemistry etc) but there are one , two or three sessions per week where there are small groups in which a case is presented like the PBL way and the students go for three weeks. Could you help, with some references about the advantages and disadvantages of this hybrid curriculum?

        Thanks for the help

 

Best regards

 Adrianta

 

Widya Mandala University

Surabaya, Indonesia

 

Dear Adriata and members,

        As I mentioned earlier in this e-group, UKM started using PBL since 1983. At that time there were only about 4-5 PBL sessions/semester. Since 2005 we started the PBL hybrid curriculum. Looking at students we could clearly see the different between the old and new curriculum particularly the willingness to share ideas, communication skills and active participation in group performance.

        In the old curriculum challenges faced by facilitators in conducting the PBL were to get the students to talk. In contrast, now we need to ensure that the discussion is on tract because sometimes students may get carried away with ideas that are not related to faculty objectives.

The other problem when you increased the number of PBL, it will definitely increase teachers' workload.

        I am sure others can add in terms of administration and coordination as well as mechanism to ensure all students that are exposed to different facilitators acquired the stated learning outcomes.

 

Dr Nabishah Mohamad

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

 

Dear Adrianta

        The advantage of a hybrid curriculum is that the students get the benefit of plenary (passive learning) as well as the PBL (active learning). But when developing the curriculum it should be decided that what content areas should be covered with plenary and what should be covered with PBL (to minimize the overlap.).  Assessment should be planned in such a way to test the knowledge component gained from both delivery methods (which is at time difficult or normal tendency is to base the assessment’ on the content areas covered with plenary)

        Also it is better to assess the PBL process as students learn a variety of "softer skills" (communication, leadership, professionalism, team work etc) through PBL which is difficult to learn from the lecture based curriculum. Also hybrid curriculum is an advantage for the students who enter the universities after secondary school education as opposed to graduate entries as it exposes the students to 'lectures' with which they are more familiar with. The disadvantage of hybrid curriculum is repetition of contents (unless planned). But one can argue that repetition too is good to a certain extent.

        Faculty has to be trained to play the dual role of an information provider (in lecture based) and a facilitator of student learning (in PBL). The efficiency of the hybrid curriculum depends to a greater extent on the ability of the Faculty to shift between these different roles.

 

A/P Dr. Joachim Perera

Center for Medical Education

International Medical University

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

 

Dear Professor Adrianta,

        Thank you for your interesting question. 

        Hawaii was fortunate.  We have small class of 60 students.  We converted to "full" PBL.  Yes, we also have hybrid curriculum, but we removed all basic science courses and retained only about 25% of former lectures and labs (1,400 hrs reduced to 350 hrs in the pre-clinical years).  The hours of basic science lectures is even smaller than 350, because many of the lectures are given by clinicians on clinical topics. 

        I am guessing, but I think a little PBL in the midst of  a lot of conventional courses and lectures can be troublesome and possibly set-up for failure.  Students may be confused.  Why should we think and learn on our own when we have all these lectures and tests to deal with?

        An experienced PBL tutor once said, poor lectures is not what we want, but poor PBL is even worse!?  Especially in medical schools with large class sizes, good PBL may be difficult to implement and sustain. 

        Have you considered a small PBL track?  With a small number of highly motivated students and a small number of experienced tutors, you may see and sustain the full potential of "excellent" PBL quickly.  After some years, you may be able to implement more and more PBL, using PBL-raised senior students as tutors.  You will then be implementing a proven curriculum and have a model of excellent PBL, which can be seen by all (faculty and students).

        If your curriculum has a lot of lectures and a little bit of PBL, then the PBL model should be a little different.  The tutorial may /should have more clinical applications and clinical reasoning sessions, since much of the knowledge is already conveyed through lectures.  Perhaps there is only need for PBL step 1 and no need for PBL step 2 and step 3.  Then students may be eager to attend tutorials - to see if they can figure out cases using knowledge conveyed through faculty lectures.

 

        Good luck!

 

Leslie Tam

Emeritus Professor

University of Hawaii, USA

 

 

Dear Adrianta
        Great to hear from you! I have been away for a few days, and am catching up on e-mails. I will throw out a few ideas, and please get back to me for a continuing conversation.
        I doubt that there are any really "pure" historical PBL curricula any more; even McMaster has changed to some extent. I think Harvard may have been the earliest to use the "hybrid" terminology, and I did a sabbatical there some years ago. I will give you an "off the top of my head" set of ideas. That is, the McMaster and New Mexico, Maastricht and Newcastle programs always regarded themselves as "pure" PBL. Reading the old literature nevertheless suggests that most schools used a combination of supporting materials, large group sessions (i.e. lectures) and regular practical classes. If you want my view, it is that PBL means using a discussion group based on a clinical problem to open up issues relating to basic physiology, anatomy, biochemistry, pathology etc. Formal information comes later when a context has been established. Students are stimulated to think and to work out amongst themselves what are the key issues, and what do they need to know to advance the problem. Most programs now are "hybrid", that is, some lectures, some practical classes, dissection, microscopy etc etc are introduced, but only AFTER the students have identified the key issues and see the need to know that stuff. The Internet has been powerful in introducing the problem and offering supporting materials. (I think we in Sydney were pretty much the first to take that route.)
        Some PBL schools made a big noise about NOT doing lectures, but most schools indeed used lectures, but called them something else - like "fixed resource sessions". I was quite horrified at the recent conference in Malaysia to hear that in some Indian schools, PBL seems to be used as a punishment! That is, students are marked for every comment they make, and humiliated if they are "wrong". I have always seen PBL as an open, shared, collaborative activity, facilitated by good supportive but not directive staff. In some other schools, there are formal lectures, and then a so-called "PBL" case is introduced to illuminate the basic science. That is the wrong way around; losing the value of stimulating thinking and generating ideas. This is a very complex subject, and one of my aims is to get people to use a common terminology.  Can we continue a dialogue?

Regards
Ann Sefton

 

Emeritus Professor

Department of Physiology

The University of Sydney

Sydney, Australia

 

Dear Adrianta,

        What are the advantages and disadvantages of hybrid-PBL? So what advantages or disadvantages are you referring to? financial advantage? (cost-effectiveness?) students’ professional competency? Students’ knowledge and skills? Teachers’ workload? or teachers’ personal enhancement and satisfaction? I think we need to ask the right question and ask answerable question. We are teaching our students this principle in evidence-based medicine, which derives itself from the main PBL spirit, i.e., evidence-based self-directed learning….making a wise decision out of many factual contents.

The query you have posted over this group discussion is a question that has been asked many times and somehow answered many times. In order to truly answer this question, one must first ask “what is the purpose for doing PBL? Or what PBL really stands for in medical education or any discipline of higher education”. So far, the answers I saw have been based primarily on knowledge acquisition…..centered on the traditional educational philosophy……but this is not the main spirit in PBL education and PBL philosophy. If one looks at PBL as just another METHOD IN TEACHING, his/her answers to this question would be very much different from those who treat PBL as an ATTITUDE IN LEARNING. So, what is the nature of the “advantages and disadvantages” are you referring to?  Hybrid PBL, on the other hand, can be classified into at least four different forms with varying effectiveness in promoting students’ professional competency and learning attitudes on the basis of pedagogic rationalization in the relative distribution and mixing student-centered, problem-based and small group learning with teacher-centered, knowledge-based and large class teaching. One form of hybrid-PBL (type I) is primarily cosmetic with 2-3 problems per academic year, being decorative under the conventional curriculum driven by teaching via didactic lectures. Often, this hybrid-PBL adopts a “me too” approach to chase after the pedagogic fashion. It is relatively easier to implement and faces less resistance.  Students or teachers will unlikely take this type of PBL seriously, because in this type of hybrid PBL, PBL is regarded merely as another method of knowledge deliberation. It can cause demoralizing damage and bring in zero advantage for teacher and students.  Some one once said, “Poor teaching is bad, but poor PBL is even worse.”

        Another form of hybrid-PBL (Type II) is to use PBL problems to enhance students’ understanding of the lecture content materials. In type II PBL tutorials, focus is placed on knowledge content or factual materials to complement lectures and content experts as tutors are preferred.  This PBL type is fundamentally traditional and conservative with minimal effectiveness to change student’s learning attitude from passive to active.  This type of PBL is often discipline-based for basic science learning and analogues to case-based teaching as in clinical teaching. In fact, case-based teaching has often been mistakenly regarded as PBL.

        A third form of hybrid-PBL (type III) is to use lectures to enhance PBL performance amongst students. Teachers in this type of hybrid PBL hold the belief that students need to be taught the “basics” prior to doing PBL.  The general premise of this form is that the students need some basic knowledge via lectures prior to PBL tutorial. In this hybrid form, learning new knowledge from unknown is minimal; rather, repetition and application of learned existing knowledge becomes the main purpose.

        The fourth form of "hybrid-PBL" (type IV) is to use of PBL as the main learning platform and add some "unconventional lectures" for the purpose of enrichment and betterment of the students’ motivation for self-directed learning.  In this format, the entire curriculum is laid out as a series of sets of PBL problems with student-centered group activities. The assessment is focused on PBL tutorial and other group functional activities, but not on conventional lectures. This form of PBL has been originally adopted by McMaster University. Since it indeed contains lectures, I classify it as one form of hybrid PBL’

        There are also four other forms of PBL curriculum deviating from the PBL philosophy in some aspects due to its content deliberation. For example, discipline-based PBL, symptom-based PBL, disease-based PBL and organ system based PBL. For one example, discipline-based PBL is based on the traditionally compartmentalized disciplines (as in Anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology, microbiology, etc). It lacks integration amongst essential disciplines for the holism of medicine as a profession and will likely end up with propensity on specific disciplinary knowledge content and requires content experts to be tutors. As such, the adequate source of tutors and the effective design of PBL triggers tend to be a serious limiting factor. 

        Depending on the format of the PBL curriculum and tutorial process, it may lead to different advantage and disadvantages in students’ leaning attitude and establishment of competency.

        Professor Ann Sefton of the University of Sydney said in her personal communication on this topic: “I doubt that there are any really "pure" historical PBL curricula any more….”. Indeed, many people have a deep-rooted misconception thinking that McMaster University represents a place using only pure PBL and offering no lectures. This perception is incorrect. At McMaster University there are 5-6 hours of lectures per week. (3-hour large group and 2-3 hour small group lectures) compared to 6 hours of PBL tutorials. The lectures employed to support PBL at McMaster’s are of “unconventional” nature being as student-centered and interactive as possible. They are not compulsory and the contents will not be examined. The lectures are not discipline-based and open to all students who wish to learn.  In this regard, McMaster's PBL fits the description of type IV hybrid-PBL. Having said that, we can conclude that there is no “pure PBL” curriculum. And, there are many hybrid-PBL curricula of varying qualities. It follows that in writing, discussing, assessing or reviewing issues or studies on PBL, we need to pay special attention to the hybrid nature of the PBL curriculum and examine its operational details in order to place a fair judgment, make the discussion constructive and render the assessment more meaningful.

 

David Kwan

China Medical University

Taichung, Taiwan

 

Dear All,
        I have followed our present thread of discussion in the last week with special interest and it has helped me reaffirm my belief in the potency of this discussion forum. I am grateful to all those who have contributed so far; you all have enriched my knowledge.
        I have always thought that this forum can only be effective and sustainable if things are allowed to take a more natural course. By this I mean our discussion topics come as and when they arise (i.e., someone comes up- as my dear Adrianta has just done- with an issue/ question that worries his/her mind); we discuss same and then go into quiescence until the next issue/question arises. Not a structured time-table /discussion, which does not seem to fit properly with Adult style of learning. That brings me to the current issue, which has to do with Adult learning (andragogy).
        I have deliberately plugged into this discussion using Prof David Kwan's reply template (see below) because I consider his contribution one of the best in answering Adrianta's question. Before I go further can I ask each of us to introspect by doing the following simple exercise.
Complete the following sentences:
1. From my perspective, the purpose of education is ------------.
2. From my perspective, the role of a teacher is to------------.
        Why this exercise? Your answers to these questions will strongly reveal / correlate with the attitudes you bring into discussion on teaching/learning. They will reveal which of the metaphilosophies of education guide your mental processing and contributions to educational discourse - the type we have on this forum. Each of us is naturally predominantly inclined to one of these: Existentialist philosophy: upholds the belief that knowledge or capacity for it exists in the individual and all the teacher does is facilitate/trigger/stimulate/motivate. Those with this bend, tend to favor and appreciate the PBL philosophy- Essentialist philosophy: believes that the individual is empty (knowledge-wise) and must be given knowledge (i.e. knowledge from the outside, not from within). Those with this inclination tend to favor lectures and find it difficult to go with the existentialist attitudes that drive the PBL paradigm.
There are other metaphilosophies, including the Experimentalist philosophy. Go back to your answer to the 2 questions above and determine which of these philosophies tends to drive your thinking/ position. This way you understand yourself and others better as we all contribute in this forum. Your predominant philosophy affects a lot of things you do in the teaching/learning domain including how you deliver lectures.
        I believe in the Existentialist (derived from the Constructivist) philosophy and so the PBL philosophy which essentially empowers the individual (not the teacher) to take charge of his/her learning. I cannot emphasize more than Prof David Kwan has, that the PBL is an attitude- a philosophy; not just another delivery tool as sometimes erroneously portrayed. It is a total package and to achieve its goals of self-directed / life-long learning, team spirit, communication skills and holism, among others, the learning environment must be predominantly existentialist- i.e. strong belief that the individual (definitely so with adult medical student- graduate or undergraduate entry programs) is capable of driving his/ her own learning, needing minimal guidance. All we need is to create the enabling (motivating- a big topic on its own) environment.
        In the early days of the introduction of the concept of 'hybrid PBL,' the often- asked question was, 'what percentage of lectures versus PBL?' The reason for this was the gut feeling/common sense that if you had more lectures than PBL, you would probably not achieve the goals/ objectives of PBL. This is basically what Prof David Kwan has said with his Hybrid-PBL classes 1 through 3 (see below). These categories of hybrid PBL would most unlikely achieve the soul purpose (the essence) of PBL- the attitude, the attitude, the attitude!!! It cannot be over-emphasized. In my opinion, the concept of hybrid-PBL is a welcome development in Medical education, promoting a mixed economy of learning as it were, but whatever mix is chosen, the principles described above must be well understood and applied. As in Alice In Wonderland, whatever mix you choose, will land you somewhere. But that somewhere may not be the intended. The danger has always been the tendency to kill the PBL philosophy while hiding under the cloak of a 'hybrid-PBL curriculum' in what is essentially a me-too PBL curriculum or better still a traditional (teacher-centered) curriculum in borrowed robes.
        Professor David Kwan, thank you very much for your contribution and Dear Adrianta, thank you for bringing this topic up.

Regards.
Francis I. Achike

Clinical Sciences Section

International Medical University
Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA

 

Dear Adrianta,

         The problem with type 1 hybrid PBL is that students see that it is an “add-on”. They will be reluctant to generate learning of their own because they already have been inundated with so much as in the “traditional” curriculum. You can of course use it, in an attempt to try and evaluate student understanding, but then that is a totally different aim for the Problem Case.

        I feel we often forget that PBL is the using of a problem to generate learning. Students when they are dealing with the case find that there are gaps in their knowledge and they cannot progress without filling in these gaps in the knowledge. This really is one of the most powerful aspects of PBL. Student led learning and in context of them working towards understanding and maybe solving a problem.

        Another practical problem with attaching a PBL activity to a traditional curriculum is that the traditional curriculum suffers from“overload” already and the PBL activity is resented by students because it creates even more overload and it actually feels worse for them if the learning outcomes are perceived to be“soft”and not “substantial” by the students.

        To this day, we still insist on allowing at least a free afternoon if not more between PBL sessions to allow students time to “search for their answers”.

There is no doubt that PBL is resource intensive but that is the price we have to pay if we truly believe that we need to train better doctors.

        Recently, Prof. Liz Farmer showed us how she managed to do large class PBL tutorial which may be an alternative for resource-stretched schools. I will be trying that out soon on an elective module that I am currently doing this summer.

 

 Philip Beh

 

Faculty of Medicine

The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

 

Dear all,

        The discussion regarding hybrid PBL curriculum has become interesting and stimulating.  I am joining the discussion for this reason. I am currently connected with the UERMMMC College of Medicine in Manila, Philippines, a proponent of the PBL curriculum in this area. From 1997 to 2006, our medical school implemented PBL as a strategy alongside lectures. However, since 2006, we have reverted to the traditional lecture-centered curriculum. A remnant of the PBL is a small group activity now labeled as integrated case session.

        I have the opportunity to observe and facilitate PBL in several US schools and in these schools, the lecture still played a part in the teaching-learning process. Based on these observations, I believe that the implementation of a pure PBL curriculum is challenging and demands administrative mandate. As a strategy, PBL serves an important function where learners develop skills not acquired in a lecture. I appreciate the confidence and clinical skills among our students who have been exposed to this strategy.

The educational philosophy of PBL has a strong impact on student learning.

 

Marivic

College of Medicine, UERMMMC

Manila, The Philippines

 

Dear all,

        Following up on the unfortunate fate of the hybrid-PBL at UERMMMC in Manila, some of you may be aware of the fact that in 2004 the Rector of University of Santo Tomas (UST) in the Philippines declared reverting-back to the traditional lecture-based curriculum from its hybrid PBL, which was established by Dean Angeles Tan Alora of the Faculty of Medicine and Surgery.  The headline of the university student newspaper printed “ PBL dumped”.  I was commissioned by WHO (the Western pacific head-office in Manila) to spend two weeks at UST to investigate over this problem.  To make a long story short, the UST curriculum seem to be quite reasonable, I interviewed many teachers involved in PBL.  They seemed to be very devoted.  I also talked to the student group separately in the absence of UST teachers and the students found PBL intellectually challenging and mind-stimulating.  However, they felt that some of the teachers were not very devoted and the curriculum was too congested.  The few faculty members who had demonstrated strong resistance against PBL and hostility towards WHO and PBL consultant were loud, noisy and politically powerful and the high ranking education administrators including the Rector had little understanding of PBL.   The PBL at UST was a very unfortunate case defeated by academic politics that contained little academic relevance.  It was an academic power struggle, lack of effective administrative communication and a shortfall in expertise in faculty development. The PBL at UERMMMC College of Medicine in Manila was dumped perhaps for the similar reasons.  Indeed, PBL program is a very high-maintenance commodity.  It needs to be sustained with regular and multiple supportive and training workshops and a core group of highly devoted and experienced faculty memebers, including top administrators because one must realize that PBL philosophy is so anti-traditional and bad habit is hard to break.  Resistance to change is inevitably always there and ready to prey on its victims.  Whether a PBL is to get accepted, survive and excel is not in its format, whether pure or hybrid, but certainly in the attitude and the process by which PBL is implemented, developed and maintained.
        Along the earlier discussion on this topic, someone refers to students as low-performer and high-performer. Again, the traditional demarcation of low versus high performers is based on knowledge content and examination results.  I must emphasize again that the reason for doing PBL is to get always from the traditional teacher-centered spoon-feeding of knowledge like in didactic lectures which have long been known to be ineffective and encourages passive attitudes. This will get worse, as the domain of knowledge is expanding with time in explosive speed.   Therefore, the traditional way of education is doomed to fail with time. It is a matter of sooner of latter. On the other hand, whatever we do, whether in the conservative “evolution” or in the aggressive “revolution”, some will succeed and some will fail, just like some students are fit for being a medical doctor and some are not.   This is a fair competitive world after all.  The failure in implementing or sustaining PBL bears no meaningful implication on the quality of this educational philosophy, it only reflects the inability and/or incapability of the very institutes that manage PBL.  Whichever the PBL model you select to adopt must be weighed against your motivation, resources, expertise, preparedness and most importantly, your realization of the limitations in each of the models.  Otherwise, the price you pay can be very high.

 

Sincerely,

 

David Kwan

China Medical University

Taichung, Taiwan

 

校園新聞:https://cmu.edu.tw/news_detail.php?id=694

cmulogos_0.jpg
回列表

2022 年

  • 「以學生為學習中心」的教學理念:問題導向學習(Problem-Based Learning, PBL)師資培訓紀實!
  • 疫情當下的校園個資保護:寶成集團資訊部曾蕙瑜協理分享實務案例!
  • 醫學技術領域英語授課之挑戰與策略:陽交大盧家鋒副教授蒞校分享EMI教學實務!
  • 從審查觀點反思教學實踐研究計畫撰寫要領:高雄醫學大學周汎澔特聘教授蒞校分享實務經驗!
  • 壓力檢測與情緒紓壓的妙方:張雅萍諮商心理師帶領教職員們自我檢測壓力指數與修復情緒創傷!
  • 申請教學實踐研究計畫的秘笈:國立臺南大學數位學習科技系林豪鏘教授分享計畫審查經驗!
  • 【活動報導】教師們關注的學習評量議題:陽交大吳俊育教授蒞校分享「混成式教學下的動態評量與學習分析」!
  • 因應Moodle數位學習系統改版,本校教發中心舉辦新版Moodle教學應用說明會!
  • 遊戲式學習正當道,台科大侯惠澤教授蒞校分享「微翻轉遊戲式學習」!
  • 期末溫馨聚會:本校舉辦「新進教師期末座談會」,聆聽教師任職心得與建議
  • 年度盛事~中國醫藥大學2020年度「傑出教授」遴選結果出爐
  • 資訊網絡發達的時代,網路使用者應尊重智慧財產權~嶺東科大曾勝珍教授暢談「數位教材製作與網路平台的使用規範」
  • 專業知能的饗宴~教師專業社群發表109年度經營成果!
  • 傑出教授表揚~本校於校務會議頒獎表揚年度「傑出教授」得獎人!
  • 提升教師專業成長~1092多元化教師研習課程出爐,歡迎全校教師與附醫醫事人員共同成長精進!
  • 關懷與支持:本校行政主管踴躍出席「新進教師期末座談會」與新進教師座談
  • 學術專業鏈結產學~醫學系蔡嘉哲教授分享研究結合產學經驗!
  • 榮耀時刻~中國醫藥大學2019年度「傑出教授」遴選結果出爐
  • 如何開始我的創業路?護理學系李國箴教授暢談創立「凱寧達康」的心路歷程
  • 以研究為基礎的教學創新!本校透過一系列培訓課程與輔助資源,鼓勵教師踴躍申請教育部「教學實踐研究計畫」
  • 學術倫理與防治英文抄襲!成大外文系劉繼仁特聘教授分享計畫論文寫作的案例與實務見解
  • 申請科技部專題研究計畫的眉角:科技部綜合規劃司鄭瓊芬副司長蒞校講授相關規範
  • 新人新氣象:水湳新校區喜迎本年度新進教師
  • 學術倫理的前車之鑑~中央研究院孫以瀚教授剖析「學術倫理案例的前因後果」!
  • 「關係到你我的校園個資保護實務」~NII產業發展協進會王俊凱執行長剖析校園常見個資保護案例
  • 因材施「評」~前教育部主秘李坤崇教授分享「如何善用教學評量激勵學生學習動機」!
  • 輕鬆開授線上教學無負擔~「線上課程製作初階班:EverCam與Moodle使用教學」幫助老師完成基本的線上教學課程!
  • 從藝術創作的過程中來表達與管理情緒~本校運動醫學系洪寶蓮教授分享「表達藝術在情緒管理之應用」!
  • 傑出教授表揚~本校於校務會議頒獎表揚年度「傑出教授」得獎人!
  • 多元化的升等策略~東海大學陳文豪副教務長分享「教學型升等經驗」!
  • 人工智慧於醫療產業所面臨之挑戰與機會~附醫大數據中心郭錦輯主任分享醫療照護實務經驗!
  • PBL(Problem Based Learning)教案寫作體驗營~本校教師發展中心舉辦「PBL教案寫作工作坊」,由校內資深Mentor帶領與會老師分組實際寫作!
  • 中醫健身養生~中醫學院顏宏融副院長分享「八段錦」健身妙用!
  • 中國醫藥大學108年度「教師專業社群」優勝團隊頒獎表揚
  • 分享同儕專業知能、經驗與成果的饗宴~本校教師發展中心舉辦教師專業社群成果分享會,藉由社群成果的發表,促進同儕相互觀摩與學習。
  • 「個人資料保護法實務探討」~NII產業發展協進會鍾欣紘法務專員闡述校園內常見的個資保護規定與案例
  • 「科技融入教學」~中華大學羅琪副教授分享數位教材與 MOOCs課程製作經驗!
  • 「批判性思考與臨床推理教學」傑出校友楊義明教授傳承寶貴教學理念!
  • 健康四大力你都掌握了嗎?亞大李信達院長(本校物治系教授)教您如何動出健康、睡出好眠!
  • 「幫助學生,成就自己」,臺科大莊榮輝副校長分享寶貴教學實務經驗
  • 【教學輔助資源】歡迎全校教師多多利用可以增進課堂上師生互動的「主動學習教室」
  • 年度優勝「教師專業社群」表揚!
  • 分享專業知能、經驗與成果的饗宴~本校教師發展中心舉辦教師專業社群成果分享會,藉由社群成果的發表,進而擴大社群經營效果。
  • 本校數位學習系統(moodle)新增:【線上IRS即時反饋系統】功能
  • 「用影像記錄教學」-本校教師發展中心舉辦「數位教材製作課程-短片教學工作坊」
  • 本校表揚105學年度典範教授與傑出教授
  • 105年度教師專業社群優勝獎頒獎典禮
  • 傑出典範表揚:教師發展中心舉辦傑出教授頒獎典禮表揚獲獎教師
  • 關懷與傾聽:教師發展中心於期末邀集新進教師交流與座談
  • 邁向國際一流大學的生力軍:教發中心舉辦「新進教師研習營」歡迎本年度新進教師
  • 【重要消息】「主動學習教室」即日起開放105學年度上學期教師教學使用登記,敬請全校教師多加利用!
  • 培育新一代優質領導管理人才:教發中心舉辦「領導管理培訓系列課程」,為本校永續經營與發展預做準備!
  • 活動預告:4/27校長講座:大學的社會責任(成功大學蘇慧貞校長主講)
  • 如何有效甄選入學生?本校護理與營養兩系主任分享甄試經驗
  • 當教學遇到創意:中正大學行銷學名師曾光華老師分享教學經驗
  • 【重要公告】105年教卓補助「教師專業社群」審查結果出爐囉!
  • 為培育優秀領導管理人才預作準備:教發中心舉辦「世界咖啡館桌長培訓營」
  • 多元交流與同儕學習:教師自發性組成之專業社群分享經營成果
  • 翻轉傳統教學、促進學習成效:加州大學長灘分校張仁玫副教授分享教學經驗
  • 【教師專業社群】即日起開放校內教師申請囉!歡迎有志一同的老師們共組專業社群,共同提升專業成長!
  • 教學典範表揚:103學年度教學優良暨教學創新教師頒獎典禮
  • 傳承與傾聽:本校教發中心於期末舉辦「新進教師期末座談會」
  • 儒醫內涵:教養有如一陣風,張恒鴻院長暢談儒醫文化
  • 翻轉高等教育:本校教發中心與教卓辦公室聯合舉辦創新教學研討會
  • 發揚傳統中醫,傳承儒醫文化:12/23讓我們一起來充實中醫藥基本素養與內涵
  • 【教學輔助】全校近4分之1的同學已在「主動學習教室」上過課並且讚不絕口,還沒登記使用的老師們歡迎您加入多元創新教學的行列喔!
  • 「PBL系列成長營」21世紀教育新趨勢:PBL教學理念之延伸--由PBL、TBL至Flip
  • 封面人物-教師專訪《從兒科醫師到醫學教育改革的領航者--楊義明教授的人生與醫學教育觀寫照》
  • 教學典範:「校級」教學優良暨教學創新教師決選結果出爐!
  • 【教學輔助】教師發展中心提供全校教師教學輔助軟硬體設備借用,歡迎多多利用喔!
  • 【教育新趨勢】10/31 PBL系列成長營「21世紀教育趨勢:由PBL、TBL至Flip」,歡迎全校教師前來共襄盛舉喔!
  • 【教師傳習與經驗交流】104年教卓補助「教師傳習團隊」審查結果出爐!
  • 活動預告:精進研究系列講座「科技部研究計畫撰寫-實務演練工作坊」
  • 新人新氣象:教發中心舉辦「新進教師研習營」喜迎本年度新進教師
  • PBL教案寫作研習營- PBL案例的設計、撰寫與審核
  • 【教學輔助】全校近4分之1的同學已在「主動學習教室」上過課並且讚不絕口,還沒登記使用的老師們歡迎您加入多元創新教學的行列喔!
  • 【教師傳習】即日起開放全校教師申請組成「教師傳習團隊」,有意願組織教學、研究等等傳習團隊的老師動作要快喔!
  • 教學典範交流與學習:教學優良暨教學創新教師教學經驗分享會
  • 103學年度教學技巧提升系列研習-主動學習教室教學經驗分享
  • 重建老師的價值:台大葉丙成老師講授BTS新時代的教學思維與方法
  • 「數位時代之教學策略」系列講座(三):雲端數位教材與翻轉教學
  • 【校內研習】「校級教學優良暨教學創新教師」教學經驗分享會,歡迎全校教師與附醫醫療人員踴躍報名參加!
  • 【校內研習】精進研究系列講座:研究論文發表之歷程~「發現、撰寫、出版、指標」 專題講座,歡迎全校教師與附醫醫療人員踴躍報名參加喔!
  • 103學年度傳承系列講座(四):教與學的藝術和科學
  • 【教師研習活動預告】歡迎全校教師踴躍報名參加!
  • 學術倫理議題:以學術論文與著作權為例
  • 數位時代之教學策略系列講座:翻轉課堂教學經驗分享
  • 教師增能系列講座:投資與風險!來自經濟學博士的觀點!
  • 回到教育的本質,找回學習主動權:不再一樣的「教」與「學」-理念與方法的重整
  • 推甄入學面談學生之技巧與原則:CFD與招生組聯合舉辦「甄選面談學生技巧研習營」
  • 推廣翻轉課堂教學;本校建置「主動學習教室」供教師教學使用
  • 【校內研習】103學年度「甄選面談學生技巧研習營」,敬請全校教師踴躍報名參加!
  • 【校內研習】教學技巧提升系列研習:不再一樣的「教」與「學」-理念與方法的重整(臺師大甄曉蘭教授主講),敬請全校教師踴躍報名參加!
  • 教師發展、傳承系列講座:林昭庚講座教授從易經陰陽學說概念談理財
  • 關懷與傾聽:103學年度新進教師期末座談會
  • 提昇教師教學專業知能與學養-103年度教師專業社群成果分享會
  • 【校內研習】103年度教師專業社群成果分享會,歡迎全校教職員踴躍報名參加。
  • 103學年度新進教師期末座談會(新進教師研習系列)
  • 教學典範表揚:102學年度教學優良暨教學創新教師頒獎典禮
  • 雲端‧行動的數位教-學新模式:iPad應用經驗與實務分享
  • 新進教師研習營:歡迎103學年度新進教師
  • 培育PBL師資的搖籃:本校CFD於9/27再度舉辦「PBL進階系列成長營」
  • 【活動預告】傳承系列講座:林昭庚董事與黃榮村講座教授分享寶貴經驗
  • 【活動預告】2014年PBL進階系列成長營
  • 【研習影音上傳通知】8/18-21「英文論文寫作工作坊」研習影音已上傳至CFD網站,歡迎當日無法參與之教師線上觀看!
  • 【活動預告】傳承系列講座:本校黃榮村前校長主講"從一年來的風波看「學術倫理」"
  • 【活動預告】2014年PBL進階系列成長營:課程設計與教案寫作
  • 【教學小幫手】「教師教學手冊」提供您教學上必備資訊!
  • 【精彩活動預告】2014年PBL進階系列成長營-課程設計與教案寫作,敬邀全校教師踴躍參加!
  • 【精彩活動預告】「社會行為科學研究倫理工作坊」,敬邀全校教師踴躍參加!
  • 典範學習:教學優良暨教學創新教師教學經驗分享會
  • 數位時代教學策略新趨勢:本校廖述盛教授專研於帶著走的「行動學習」科技,讓app成為社群輔助教學的好幫手!
  • CFD辛主任受邀中國大陸全國PBL高階研討擔任講座,介紹台灣通識倫理教學採用PBL之經驗
  • 【校長講座】李文華 校長闡述治校理念與願景:讓我們共同創造中國醫藥大學的驕傲
  • 培養學生「帶得走的能力」- 確保學習成效之課程改革經驗分享
  • 「教材資源室」:製作數位教材的好幫手,歡迎老師們前來借用與使用喔!
  • 「教材資源室」:製作數位教材的好幫手,歡迎老師們前來借用與使用喔!
  • 典範傳承:本校藥學院郭盛助講座教授分享以教研為終身職志--由從事新藥開發研究之心路歷程說起
  • 精進研究系列講座-許重義總執行長主講「國際期刊投稿之學術倫理」本校教師與各級研究人員熱烈參與
  • 學習正在改變,教學要有因應策略:台灣大學岳修平教授分享翻轉課堂教學經驗
  • 甄選面談學生的技巧與大原則:CFD與教務處聯合舉辦「甄選面談學生技巧研習營」
  • 生命教育教學之實踐—服務學習教學法之理念、方法及成效
  • 【精彩活動預告】102學年度「甄選面談學生技巧研習營」,敬邀全校教師踴躍參加!
  • 【精彩活動預告】102學年度教師成長專題演講(3),敬邀全校教師踴躍參加!
  • 【精彩活動預告】「社會行為科學研究倫理工作坊」,敬邀全校教師踴躍參加!
  • 【精彩活動預告】102學年度傳承系列講座(三): 以教研為終身職志--由從事新藥開發研究之心路歷程說起, 歡迎校內教師踴躍參加。
  • 數位世代的教學議題:著作權的合理使用與部分授權
  • 「教材資源室」:製作數位教材的好幫手,歡迎老師們前來借用與使用喔!
  • 【精彩活動預告】102學年度傳承系列講座(三): 以教研為終身職志--由從事新藥開發研究之心路歷程說起, 歡迎校內教師踴躍參加。
  • 【精彩活動預告】「數位時代之教學策略」系列講座:數位課程教材應注意的著作權議題,因應數位時代的來臨,敬邀全校教師踴躍參加!
  • 「翻轉課堂實作工作坊」:翻轉您對於傳統授課方式的看法!
  • 【重要公告】103年教卓補助「教師專業社群」審查結果出爐囉!
  • 102學年度新進教師期末座談會
  • 「二十一世紀人才培育」:東華大學吳茂昆校長暢談教育理念
  • 102學年度評鑑系列講座(二): 臺北醫學大學學校內控稽核經驗分享
  • 【教師專業社群】即日起開放校內教師申請囉!歡迎有志一同的老師們共組專業社群,共同提升專業成長!
  • 典範傳承:本校生物科技學系周昌弘 講座教授分享「以學術專業投入社會活動」
  • 新進教師研習營:中國醫大注入新血輪-歡迎102學年度新進教師
  • 教學典範表揚:101學年度教學優良暨教學創新教師頒獎典禮
  • 教學典範:「校級」教學優良暨教學創新教師決選結果出爐!
  • 如何扮演一個成功的引導老師?CFD舉辦PBL師資訓練營培訓PBL tutor
  • 【年度盛事】本校將於11/12遴選「101學年度校級教學優良暨教學創新教師」,歡迎全校教職員生共襄盛舉!
  • 典範傳承:本校公衛學院宋鴻樟講座教授分享研究計畫申請經驗
  • 【好消息】教師培育暨發展中心提供本校教師教學儀器設備「掃描翻譯筆、攜帶型掃描器、平板電腦、單眼相機」使用,敬請老師多加利用!
  • 強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍:IRS讓上課更精彩。
  • 【好消息】教師培育暨發展中心提供本校教師教學儀器設備「掃描翻譯筆、攜帶型掃描器、平板電腦」使用,敬請老師多加利用!
  • 本校CFD主任辛幸珍與附設醫院林嘉德副院長及教學部團隊參加第二屆國際CFD大會暨第四十屆歐洲醫學教育年會(AMEE),圓滿歸來”
  • 102學年度「精進研究系列講座」(二) 如何撰寫與投稿學術期刊: Professor Paul MH Dummer專題演講
  • 【精彩活動預告】「2013年PBL師資訓練營」, 歡迎校內教師踴躍參加。
  • 教學小幫手:102學年度「教師手冊」
  • 【精彩活動預告】102學年度新進教師研習營,敬請校內教師踴躍報名參加。
  • 【精彩活動預告】「2013年PBL師資訓練營」, 歡迎校內教師踴躍參加。
  • 「教師傳習制度」即日起開放申請囉! 歡迎有意願自我提升的老師踴躍參加共組傳習團隊喔!
  • 「教師傳習制度」即日起開放申請囉! 歡迎有意願自我提升的老師踴躍參加共組傳習團隊喔!
  • 教師培養第二專長:本校鼓勵教師申請第二專長之國內學位進修
  • 強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍:IRS讓上課更精彩。
  • 「小小改變、大大效益」:實物提示機 讓您增進教學上的成效喔!
  • 強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍:IRS讓上課更精彩。
  • 教師培養第二專長:本校鼓勵教師申請第二專長之國內學位進修
  • 想學網頁設計,不知該如何起手? 從frontpage開始學就對了!
  • 「數位時代之教學策略」系列講座報導-利用雲端硬碟及雲端軟體用於教學的個人經驗分享
  • 您不可不知的「數位時代教學策略」:校園著作權議題
  • 【封面人物】專訪公衛學院蔡朋枝院長
  • 教師培養第二專長:本校鼓勵教師申請第二專長之國內學位進修
  • 「數位時代之教學策略」系列講座:「數位時代的學生特質與課程設計」
  • 威力導演 PowerDirector 讓你馬上成為專業級的影片導演
  • 【精彩活動預告】校長講座(三):東海大學 湯銘哲校長專題演講,敬邀老師參加~
  • Excel試算表課程,讓你成為效率達人
  • 【精彩活動預告】「數位時代之教學策略」系列講座二:數位時代的學生特質與課程設計,敬請老師報名參加~
  • 【精彩活動預告】專題演講:Can people get addicted to palatable food? 你想知道成癮行為的由來嗎? 歡迎前來聆聽Dr. Wang, Gene-Jack 精闢的解說!
  • 【精彩活動預告】吳健雄院士vs.居禮夫人專題演講系列三,邀請全校師生一同來參加喔!
  • 「實體素材即時e化的利器」:實物提示機
  • 數位時代的教學策略:IRS即時反饋系統教學工作坊
  • 101學年度「甄選面談學生技巧研習營」
  • 【精彩活動預告】「數位教材製作系列課程」開放報名囉!想要豐富教材內容與創新教法的老師們一定要來參加喔!
  • 【精彩活動預告】「數位教材製作系列課程」開放報名囉!想要豐富教材內容與創新教法的老師們一定要來參加喔!
  • 教材製作的好幫手:「教材資源室」歡迎老師們來親臨體驗與使用喔!
  • 【教師專業社群】即日起開放校內教師申請囉!歡迎有志一同的老師們共組專業社群,共同提升專業成長!
  • 101學年度新進教師期末座談會
  • 《教學國際化》-全英語授課種子教師經驗分享會
  • 年度盛事:100學年度「校級」教學優良暨教學創新教師遴選盛會
  • Follow me邁向頂尖大學~國立臺灣大學校長李嗣涔心得分享
  • 號外!號外!!「教材資源室」即將於近日內隆重開幕囉~~
  • 「2012年全國PBL案例撰寫競賽」來囉~~敬請老師們踴躍賜稿喔!
  • 強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍:IRS讓上課更精彩。
  • 登峰500,注入新血輪;胼手胝足,共創新未來!~~CFD與人事室聯合主辦新進教師研習營
  • 您不可不知的智慧財產權相關議題!
  • 教師培育暨發展中心提供本校教師教學輔助軟體「PhotoImpact X3」與「威力導演9」正式版!
  • 「教師傳習制度」即日起開放申請囉! 歡迎有意願自我提升的老師踴躍參加共組傳習團隊喔!
  • 教學小幫手:101學年度「教師教學手冊」
  • 【好書推薦】本中心購置一批教育類叢書,歡迎校內教師多加利用!
  • 強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍:IRS讓上課更精彩。
  • 精彩活動預告
  • 培育PBL師資的搖籃:中國醫藥大學再度舉辦PBL師資訓練營散播PBL的種子
  • 教師傳習團隊交流互動提醒!7月底前需至少再互動交流1次
  • 「啟蒙作為一種志業,知識份子永恆不易的定位」專題演講
  • 『教』與『學』雙向互動.即時掌握學生學習成效!《歡迎教師預約借用IRS即時反饋小幫手》
  • 精彩活動預告
  • 教師傳習團隊交流互動提醒!
  • 「工欲善其事,必先利其器」:數位教材製作系列課程培訓
  • 教師培育暨發展中心提供本校教師教學輔助軟體「PhotoImpact X3」與「威力導演9」正式版!
  • 100學年度「甄選面談學生技巧研習營」甄選入學--選才面面觀
  • 教師培育暨發展中心提供本校教師教學輔助軟體「PhotoImpact X3」與「威力導演9」正式版!
  • 校長講座系列演講:歡迎來聆聽本校黃榮村校長與輔仁大學江漢聲校長的精彩演講!
  • 「教師傳習制度」即日起開放申請囉!歡迎有意願自我提升的老師踴躍參加共組傳習團隊!
  • 第六屆血管生物研究與進展國際研討會來囉!邀請8國來賓專題演講,機會難得,歡迎踴躍前來聆聽!
  • 精彩活動預告:數位教材製作系列課程
  • 強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍:IRS讓上課更精彩。
  • 【好書推薦】本中心購置一批教育類叢書,歡迎校內教師多加利用!
  • 教師培育暨發展中心提供本校教師教學輔助軟體「PhotoImpact X3」與「威力導演9」正式版序號!
  • 「教師傳習制度」即日起開放申請囉!歡迎有意願自我提升的老師踴躍參加共組傳習團隊!
  • 精彩活動預告
  • 精彩活動預告!
  • CFD提供您不可不知的智慧財產權相關議題
  • 【好書推薦】本中心購置一批教育類叢書,歡迎校內教師多加利用!
  • 《好消息》教師培育暨發展中心提供本校教師教學輔助軟體「PhotoImpact X3」與「威力導演9」正式版序號!(附教學影片)
  • IRS使用人次大幅攀升.迎接新學期就用IRS強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍!
  • 典範傳承與傾聽心聲:「新進教師期末座談會」幫助老師們發展與平衡他們的多重角色
  • 教師培育暨發展中心特別講座《想像力比知識更重要》:密西根韋恩州立大學 洪正幸教授專題演講
  • 活動預告:100學年度新進教師期末座談會
  • 「小小改變、大大效益」:實物提示機 讓您增進教學上的成效喔!
  • 『教』與『學』雙向互動.即時掌握學生學習成效!《歡迎教師預約借用IRS即時反饋小幫手》
  • 教學典範:99學年度教學優良教師頒獎典禮
  • 《向蚊子.學管理》~找對的方法、做對的事;長榮大學校長陳錦生傳授『蚊學』的經驗智慧
  • 【活動預告】校長講座:12/12讓我們跟著長榮大學陳錦生校長向蚊子學管理!
  • 培育PBL師資的搖籃:中國醫藥大學與中山醫學大學再度攜手合辦PBL師資訓練營
  • 上海交通大學醫學院蒞校參訪暨PBL師資訓練
  • 年度盛會:99學年度校級「教學優良教師」遴選會
  • 精彩活動預告
  • 這麼多的老師都在用IRS即時反饋系統,您是不是也心動了呢?
  • CFD與中區區域性研究倫理建置中心合辦「倫理:研究與教育」國際研討會圓滿成功
  • 新進教師研習營:喜迎100學年度新進教師
  • 「教師培育暨發展中心(CFD)-近期活動預告」敬邀參與!
  • 教學小幫手:100學年度「教師教學手冊」
  • 中區區域性研究倫理建置中心與CFD合辦「專業、研究、學術領域之倫理議題研討」圓滿成功
  • 中區區域性研究倫理中心於100年8月26日於本校舉辦「研究中對研究參與者的額外保護」專家演講圓滿成功
  • 強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍-【IRS】讓上課更精彩。
  • 教師培育暨發展中心提供教師「威力導演9、PhotoImpact X3、PowerCam」三套教學輔助軟體借用
  • 即日起教師培育暨發展中心提供教師「威力導演9、PhotoImpact X3、PowerCam」三套實用軟體借用,敬請多加利用!
  • 【封面人物.教師專訪】校內教務改革推手—鍾景光教務長專訪
  • 從傳道、授業、解惑談課程設計與教學成效~陳偉德副校長傳承道貫古今的經驗
  • 「教師論壇交流平台」教師心聲、PBL專區、國內外會議心得分享。
  • IRS幫您做到:自動點名、無紙化測驗、成績電子化、增進課堂師生互動!!!
  • 「徵稿啟事」《教師電子報徵稿說明》歡迎賜稿!
  • 99學年度教學工作坊(六)教學活動設計與技巧
  • 《博雅教育》~培育21世紀人才─大學的責任;東海大學校長程海東博士受邀蒞校演講
  • 讓「教」與「學」零時差-IRS幫您即時診斷學生學習狀況!
  • 即日起教師培育暨發展中心提供教師「威力導演9、PhotoImpact X3、PowerCam」三套實用軟體借用,敬請多加利用!
  • 即日起教師培育暨發展中心提供教師「威力導演9、PhotoImpact X3、PowerCam」三套實用軟體借用,敬請多加利用!
  • 教師培育暨發展中心6月份研習活動預告
  • 因應100年校務評鑑,您不可不知的「學生學習成效評量」
  • 即日起教師培育暨發展中心提供教師「威力導演9、PhotoImpact X3、PowerCam」三套實用軟體借用,敬請多加利用!
  • 創新教學內容與技巧:「數位教材製作系列研習課程」
  • 99學年度教學工作坊系列活動(四)「教學表達的技術與藝術」
  • 教師教學營:孕育有效教學的動力與氣息
  • 「徵稿啟事」《教師電子報徵稿說明》歡迎賜稿!
  • 「教師論壇交流平台」教師心聲、PBL專區、經驗分享…
  • 讓「教」與「學」零時差-IRS幫您即時診斷學生學習狀況!
  • 「99學年度北港分部學生PBL認知營」-體解最佳化教學模式
  • 從「樂教與樂學」中談如何營造課堂學習氣氛
  • 「徵稿啟事」CFD《教師電子報》歡迎賜稿!
  • 「教師論壇交流平台」教師心聲、教學策略與經驗分享…
  • 強化教學,營造課堂熱絡氛圍!-「IRS」讓上課更精彩。
  • 教師培育暨發展中心:4、5月份教師研習課程預告
  • 教師培育暨發展中心:4、5月份教師研習課程預告
  • 擇適才而教之:甄選面談學生技巧研習營
  • 「教師論壇交流平台」教師心聲、教學策略與經驗分享!
  • 「徵稿啟事」CFD《教師電子報》歡迎賜稿!
  • 專注學習,建立師生互動! IRS幫您搭起溝通橋樑。
  • The 5th International Vascular Biology Research Symposium
  • 傳承與傾聽:99學年度新進教師期末座談會
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 教學楷模:98學年度教學優良教師頒獎典禮
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 99學年度牙醫學系新生PBL認知營
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 99學年度教師成長系列講座:讓生命更豐富
  • 年度盛事:98學年度「校級」教學優良教師遴選盛會
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 2010年亞太地區國際PBL聯合學術研討會衛星PBL工作坊
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 活動預告:2010年亞太地區國際PBL聯合學術研討會衛星PBL工作坊
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的好所在喔!
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 開啟STEM學程潮流的幕後推手-專訪李英雄副校長
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 99學年度教師生力軍:新進教師研習
  • 科技始終來自於人性:IRS互動性教學系統推廣紀實
  • 99學年度PBL教案寫作研習營
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 99學年度『培養未來醫師之科學能力』 研討會
  • 99學年度教學工作坊(一)大學班級營
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 即日起「教師論壇交流平台」提供您一個暢所欲言的空間喔!
  • 體驗IRS互動性教學系統的魔力,花個20分鐘讓您的視野更遼闊!
  • 98學年度PBL教案寫作研習營
  • 您還在為大班教學感到苦惱嗎? IRS幫您解決難題!
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 教學工作坊(六)學習評量的理論與技術
  • 專訪中國醫學研究所 林昭庚教授
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 您還在為大班教學感到苦惱嗎? IRS幫您解決難題!
  • 精進研究系列(三)如何撰寫英文研究論文
  • IRS互動性教學系統工作坊(二)
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 校長講座(三)將壓力(Stressed)轉換成生命中的甜點(Desserts)
  • 教學好幫手:IRS互動性教學系統簡介
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 九十八學年度初階PBL師資訓練營
  • 牙醫PBL教案寫作訓練營
  • 您還在為大班教學感到苦惱嗎? IRS幫您解決難題!
  • 教師電子報徵稿啟事,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 找尋所愛,愛你所選--專訪生科系徐媛曼老師
  • 北港分部護理學系新生PBL認知營
  • 校長講座(二)從大學與人的理念,檢討辦學與人才培育
  • 98學年度「IRS互動性教學系統工作坊」
  • 甄選面談學生技巧研習營
  • 基礎暨臨床醫學課程教學技巧研討會
  • 教學好幫手:IRS互動性教學系統簡介
  • 「教師電子報徵稿啟事說明」,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 教學工作坊(五)教學輔助資源
  • 好書推薦:PBL問題導向學習之理念、方法、實務與經驗
  • 教學工作坊(四)課程設計與規劃
  • 教師電子報: what do people think about hybrid-PBL in the Asia Pacific region?
  • 98學年度新進教師期末座談會
  • 97學年度教學優良教師特刊發刊囉!
  • 教學典範:97學年度教學優良教師頒獎典禮
  • 「教師電子報徵稿啟事」,歡迎踴躍投稿!
  • 年度盛事:97學年度「校級」教學優良教師遴選盛會
  • Quantum Dots 專題演講
  • 醫學教育「明日醫師」研討會
  • 教師電子報徵稿囉,歡迎教師踴躍投稿!
  • 教學工作坊(三)大學教與學
  • 牙醫系新生PBL認知營
  • 教師電子報: OSU臨床藥學實習教學參訪經驗分享
  • 北京大學醫學部蒞校觀摩PBL(問題導向學習)課程!
  • 活動預告--教學工作坊(三)大學校園教與學
  • 「教師電子報徵稿啟事說明」歡迎教師踴躍投稿
  • PBL在科技教育上的應用與實作
  • 「教師電子報徵稿啟事說明」
  • 英文研習會〈五〉:『再造英語力:新帝國、新趨勢、新方法』
  • 提升研究能量:研究傑出教師經驗分享!
  • 灌輸學生自主學習理念:中醫學系PBL認知營
  • 「教師電子報徵稿啟事說明」,歡迎教師踴躍投稿!
  • 活動預告:校長講座
  • 教學小幫手:教師教學手冊
  • IRS專區:IRS即時反饋式創新教學
  • 齊心向前、創新與創業-98學年度校務主管研習營
  • 98學年度新進教師研習營
  • 「98學年度教學工作坊(二)如何提升教學成效」
  • 活動預告
  • 教師研習影音分享區開播囉!
  • 活動預告
  • 活動預告
  • 活動預告
  • 活動預告(98.07.01~98.07.15)
  • 活動預告【98/6/16-6/30】
  • 影音數位教材製作研習營
  • 活動預告
  • 活動預告
  • 96學年度教學優良教師頒獎典禮
  • 英文研習會〈四〉:精進英文能力系列講座
  • 第一次使用IRS的感動!
  • 本校目前購置之IRS 相關設備與使用須知!
  • IRS即時反饋式創新教學!
  • 活動預告(98.5.1~98.5.15)
  • 北港分部一年級學生PBL認知營系列課程之二
  • 年度盛事:96學年度全校教學優良教師遴選即將展開!
  • 活動預告(98年4月16至98年4月30日)
  • 「97學年度提升授課品質系列研習:如何提升授課品質暨作好學習評量」
  • 活動預告【98.04.01~98.04.15】
  • 活動預告(98.3.15~98.3.31)
  • 年度盛事--教學優良教師遴選開跑:96學年度教學優良教師遴選說明會
  • 提升PBL Tutor訓練,增進PBL教學質量:同心齊力,資源共享-97學年度初階PBL師資訓練營-
  • 活動預告【98.03.01~98.03.15】
  • 活動預告(98年2月15-2月31日)
  • 97學年度新進教師期末座談會
  • 活動預告【98.01.15~98.01.31】
  • 研習活動預告
  • PBL教案庫教案查詢服務啟動!
  • 教學論壇
  • 提升學術研究產能研討會
  • 活動預告 【活動期間97.12.15~97.12.31】
  • 一年級學生PBL認知營系列課程
  • 提升PBL Tutor訓練,為激發學生自主學習加分-進階PBL師資訓練營-
  • 95學年度教學優良教師頒獎典禮
  • 精進教學講座計新進教師研習系列一:「精進教學與專業發展」
  • 精進研究系列講座一:「如何撰寫成功的研究計畫」
  • 「批判性思考與臨床推理教學」傑出校友楊義明教授傳承寶貴教學理念!
  • 「科技融入教學」~中華大學羅琪副教授分享數位教材與 MOOCs課程製作經驗!
  • 【活動報導】「科技融入教學」~中華大學羅琪副教授分享數位教材與 MOOCs課程製作經驗!
  • 【活動報導】申請科技部專題研究計畫的眉角:科技部綜合規劃司鄭瓊芬副司長蒞校講授相關規範
  • 【活動報導】專業知能的饗宴~教師專業社群發表109年度經營成果!
  • 【活動報導】資訊網絡發達的時代,網路使用者應尊重智慧財產權~嶺東科大曾勝珍教授暢談「數位教材製作與網路平台的使用規範」
  • 【活動報導】遊戲式學習正當道,台科大侯惠澤教授蒞校分享「微翻轉遊戲式學習」! 

中國醫藥大學教師發展中心

校本部
406040 台中市北屯區經貿路一段100號卓越大樓11樓
04-22053366#1621、1622
cmucfd@mail.cmu.edu.tw
首頁
  • 認識我們
    • 中心成員及執掌
    • 歷屆主任
  • 教學研習
    • 教師研習活動報名區
    • 活動集錦
    • 教學研習影音分享區
    • 教師研習活動積分查詢方式
    • 教師研習活動積分申請作業
    • AI人工智慧研習影音專區
  • 新進教師
    • 傳習制度
    • 隨堂錄影
    • 新進教師研習營
  • 傑出教授
    • 傑出教授遴選與獎勵辦法
    • 歷屆獲獎教師名單
    • 表格與特刊下載
  • 教師專業社群
    • 核定名單
    • 表格下載
    • 獲獎社群
  • 重點宣導
    • 教學實踐研究計畫專區
    • IDS教學設計服務
    • PBL專區
    • 學術倫理專區
    • 智慧財產權專區
  • 借用項目
    • 主動學習教室
    • IRS即時反饋系統
    • 教學輔助器材
  • 資料下載
回到頁面最上方